Web application & API testing
Examine authentication, authorization, session handling, input validation and business logic within the approved scope.
Give leadership a clear view of exposure and give engineers findings they can act on. CCS helps SMEs scope and deliver authorized security testing across applications, APIs, networks and cloud environments, with business impact, evidence and remediation priorities at the centre of the engagement.
Scope a penetration testStart with the business problem. Scope the work around your team, systems and priorities. Agree the acceptance criteria before implementation.
Examine authentication, authorization, session handling, input validation and business logic within the approved scope.
Review agreed internet-facing assets and network services, then validate relevant weaknesses under controlled conditions.
Assess agreed Azure or AWS configurations, role boundaries and access paths with the necessary account and provider permissions.
Translate findings into executive priorities and technical actions. Recheck agreed fixes within the contracted retest window.
The OWASP Web Security Testing Guide provides a structured reference for web application security testing. CCS can use relevant test categories to shape application coverage, alongside the client’s architecture, business workflows and agreed rules of engagement.
Read the technical guidance ↗OWASP · Web Security Testing GuideThese independent references support the technical approach. They do not imply vendor endorsement, certification or verified CCS client outcomes.
You receive the scope, findings and remediation priorities in a form your team can use. Testing authority, evidence handling and ownership of every next step are agreed before work begins.
Written scope and authorized assets
Named technical contact and stop authority
Client-owned findings and supporting evidence
Remediation owners and agreed priorities
Defined evidence handling and retention
Retest scope and closure criteria
These are the standards CCS uses to challenge decisions, reduce risk and improve long-term operability.
Agree assets, accounts, testing windows, exclusions and rules of engagement before any testing begins.
Combine tool-assisted coverage with manual validation to distinguish exploitable issues from scanner noise.
Examine role boundaries, workflow permissions and sensitive actions within the agreed application scope.
Agree impact limits, escalation and stop conditions. Disruptive techniques require separate explicit authorization.
Provide reproducible findings, affected assets, impact and practical remediation guidance with sensitive data minimized.
Revisit agreed findings after fixes and report what is closed, still exposed or outside the retest scope.
Well-governed infrastructure, portable systems, trusted data, secure identities and documented operations can improve scalability, reduce key-person dependency and support stronger due-diligence readiness.